How the whole universe came into being is still a mystery to many. Many theories have thus come up to try and explain how they were formed and why they are in their current positions. They are known as the theories of evolution, and mostly they are in opposition to the creation story in the bible. According to them, the universe was formed through natural means. However, there are number of arguments against evolution which have be put forward.
Lack of individuals who witnessed evolution as it occurred brings about a point of argument. The theories are just hypotheses and there is no one in history who can be said to be a witness. Even at the present period, it is hard to see evolution as it takes place. They have also failed to show transitional forms on how the process took place. As a matter of fact, flora and fauna need not to be differentiated if what they claim is true.
Research has been carried out for a long time with experiments being done with the aim of creating new species using the evolutionary methods. For example, the fruit fly has mainly been used in these experiments since it is characterized by a high reproduction rate. However, these tests have been futile because the mutation did not take place as it is expected according to the theories by evolutionists.
Annually, meteoritic dust settles on top of the earth and the moon. This happens in a continuous process and thus if the earth and the moon were as old as they are said to be, then the pile would have been so big. This would have even made the first ship on the moon to sink, of which was not the case. When the ship landed, less than an inch of the dust is what was found. This therefore suggests that the moon is still young and so is the earth.
The magnetic field of the earth keeps on reducing at a rapid rate. If this is the case, then eight thousand years ago its magnetism would have been the same with that of a magnetic star. The possibility of this occurrence is highly unlikely.
Evolutionists believe that there are some electric fields within the earth which give rise to its magnetism. If this is so, then the earth would have dissolved thousands of years ago due to the large amounts of heat produced then. It is therefore difficult to agree with this theory.
Many people have been questioning the geological evidence that has been provided to support evolution. The main question is here is why are there no transitional fossils to show how the current species changed through various forms. This what mainly led to the development of the punctuated equilibria theory. According to it, one species could develop into another, for example mammals being born by birds.
From the research carried out by scientists, the probability of the punctuated equilibria theory is very minimal. Some of these theories have lacked a proper basis and thus the reason for these arguments against evolution. Most people therefore still hold on to the original story in the bible.
Lack of individuals who witnessed evolution as it occurred brings about a point of argument. The theories are just hypotheses and there is no one in history who can be said to be a witness. Even at the present period, it is hard to see evolution as it takes place. They have also failed to show transitional forms on how the process took place. As a matter of fact, flora and fauna need not to be differentiated if what they claim is true.
Research has been carried out for a long time with experiments being done with the aim of creating new species using the evolutionary methods. For example, the fruit fly has mainly been used in these experiments since it is characterized by a high reproduction rate. However, these tests have been futile because the mutation did not take place as it is expected according to the theories by evolutionists.
Annually, meteoritic dust settles on top of the earth and the moon. This happens in a continuous process and thus if the earth and the moon were as old as they are said to be, then the pile would have been so big. This would have even made the first ship on the moon to sink, of which was not the case. When the ship landed, less than an inch of the dust is what was found. This therefore suggests that the moon is still young and so is the earth.
The magnetic field of the earth keeps on reducing at a rapid rate. If this is the case, then eight thousand years ago its magnetism would have been the same with that of a magnetic star. The possibility of this occurrence is highly unlikely.
Evolutionists believe that there are some electric fields within the earth which give rise to its magnetism. If this is so, then the earth would have dissolved thousands of years ago due to the large amounts of heat produced then. It is therefore difficult to agree with this theory.
Many people have been questioning the geological evidence that has been provided to support evolution. The main question is here is why are there no transitional fossils to show how the current species changed through various forms. This what mainly led to the development of the punctuated equilibria theory. According to it, one species could develop into another, for example mammals being born by birds.
From the research carried out by scientists, the probability of the punctuated equilibria theory is very minimal. Some of these theories have lacked a proper basis and thus the reason for these arguments against evolution. Most people therefore still hold on to the original story in the bible.
About the Author:
The following online page daywithoutyesterday.net is one of the most reliable sources of information that explains about arguments against evolution . Come and review the published posts by logging on to http://daywithoutyesterday.net immediately.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Don't use active link, spamming, phising or making chaos